𝙰𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙷𝚘𝚕𝚢 𝚂𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕. “𝚆𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕, 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚝 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍” “𝙵𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎. 𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖, 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑, ”𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚁𝚎𝚟. . “𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚜𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚏𝚝 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎: 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚖𝚎, 𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚗𝚎𝚍, 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚎, 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚜”

𝑆𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝐹𝐹𝑅𝐹) 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝒉𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑈𝑆 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑠𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑡𝒉𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝒉𝑒𝑦 𝒉𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦. 𝑇𝒉𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐵𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑎 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎 𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑠𝑢𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑤𝒉𝑖𝑐𝒉 𝑡𝒉𝑒𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝒉𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑐𝒉𝑢𝑟𝑐𝒉 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝒉𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝒉𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝒉𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝒉𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑

ℐ ℊ𝒾𝓋ℯ 𝓉𝓌ℴ 𝓆𝓊ℴ𝓉𝒶𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃𝓈 𝒻𝓇ℴ𝓂 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝒜𝓅ℴ𝒸𝒶𝓁𝓎𝓅𝓈ℯ 𝒶𝓈 𝒶 𝓀𝒾𝓃𝒹 ℴ𝒻 𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓃𝓉ℯ𝓈𝓈ℯ𝓃𝒸ℯ ℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓈𝓉ℴ𝓇𝓎 ℴ𝒻 𝒮𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓃 𝓈ℯ𝓉 𝒻ℴ𝓇𝓉𝒽 𝒾𝓃 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝒷ℴℴ𝓀. 𝒯𝒽ℯ 𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓈𝓉 𝓆𝓊ℴ𝓉𝒶𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃 𝓈𝒽ℴ𝓌𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝒮𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓃 𝒾𝓈 𝓉𝒽ℯ ℋℯ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃𝓁𝓎 𝒜𝒸𝒸𝓊𝓈ℯ𝓇 ℴ𝒻 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝓀𝒾𝓃𝒹 𝒷ℯ𝒻ℴ𝓇ℯ 𝒢ℴ𝒹, 𝒶𝓃𝒹 𝒻𝓇ℴ𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 ℴ𝒻𝒻𝒾𝒸ℯ ℋℯ 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁, 𝒶𝒸𝒸ℴ𝓇𝒹𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓉ℴ 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝓅𝓇ℴ𝓅𝒽ℯ𝒸𝓎, 𝒷ℯ 𝓇ℯ𝓂ℴ𝓋ℯ𝒹 𝒾𝓃 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝒻𝓊𝓉𝓊𝓇ℯ. ℐ𝓃 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓈ℯ𝒸ℴ𝓃𝒹 𝓆𝓊ℴ𝓉𝒶𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃, 𝓉𝒶𝓀ℯ𝓃 𝒻𝓇ℴ𝓂 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓁𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝓅𝒶ℊℯ ℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝒩ℯ𝓌 𝒯ℯ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓂ℯ𝓃𝓉, 𝒥ℯ𝓈𝓊𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓁𝓁𝓈 𝒽𝒾𝓂𝓈ℯ𝓁𝒻 "𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 ℴ𝒻 ℒ𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉 𝒶𝓃𝒹 ℳℴ𝓇𝓃𝒾𝓃ℊ", 𝓌𝒽𝒾𝒸𝒽 𝒸𝒶𝓃 𝒷ℯ 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓈𝓁𝒶𝓉ℯ𝒹 𝒾𝓃𝓉ℴ ℒ𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝒶𝓈 "ℒ𝓊𝒸𝒾𝒻ℯ𝓇" ("𝓁𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉𝒷ℯ𝒶𝓇ℯ𝓇"; "ℒ𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉ℬℯ𝒶𝓇ℯ𝓇" - ℴ𝓃ℯ ℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝒶𝓃𝒸𝒾ℯ𝓃𝓉 𝓃𝒶𝓂ℯ𝓈 ℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓃ℯ𝓉 𝒱ℯ𝓃𝓊𝓈, "𝓂ℴ𝓇𝓃𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇", 𝓌𝒽𝒾𝒸𝒽 𝓅𝓇ℯ𝒸ℯ𝒹ℯ𝓈 𝒾𝓉𝓈 𝒶𝓅𝓅ℯ𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸ℯ 𝒾𝓃 𝓉𝒽ℯ ℰ𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝓈𝓊𝓃𝓇𝒾𝓈ℯ). ℐ𝓃 ℴ𝓁𝒹 𝒯ℯ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓂ℯ𝓃𝓉 𝓉𝒾𝓂ℯ𝓈, ℒ𝓊𝒸𝒾𝒻ℯ𝓇 𝓌𝒶𝓈 𝓃ℴ𝓉 𝒶𝓈𝓈ℴ𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓉ℯ𝒹 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝒮𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓃, 𝓃ℴ𝓇 𝓌𝒶𝓈 𝒽ℯ 𝓉𝒽ℴ𝓊ℊ𝒽𝓉 ℴ𝒻 𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝒽ℯ 𝒮𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓃 ℯ𝓍𝒾𝓁ℯ𝒹 𝒻𝓇ℴ𝓂 𝒽&a

ℑ 𝔴𝔬𝔲𝔩𝔡 𝔩𝔦𝔨𝔢 𝔱𝔬 𝔪𝔞𝔨𝔢 𝔦𝔱 𝔠𝔩𝔢𝔞𝔯, 𝔱𝔬 𝔠𝔩𝔞𝔯𝔦𝔣𝔶 𝔰𝔭𝔢𝔠𝔦𝔣𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩𝔩𝔶 𝔴𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔦𝔰 𝔦𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔅𝔦𝔟𝔩𝔢 𝔞𝔟𝔬𝔲𝔱 𝔖𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔴𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔦𝔱 𝔡𝔬𝔢𝔰 𝔫𝔬𝔱 𝔰𝔞𝔶. 𝔚𝔥𝔢𝔫 ℑ 𝔠𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔪𝔶 𝔟𝔬𝔬𝔨 𝔖𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫: 𝔞 𝔅𝔦𝔬𝔤𝔯𝔞𝔭𝔥𝔶, ℑ 𝔭𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔱 𝔡𝔦𝔯𝔢𝔠𝔱𝔩𝔶 𝔱𝔬 𝔍𝔞𝔠𝔨 𝔪𝔦𝔩𝔢𝔰'𝔰 𝔊𝔬𝔡: 𝔞 𝔅𝔦𝔬𝔤𝔯𝔞𝔭𝔥𝔶. ℑ𝔫 𝔡𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔰𝔬, ℑ 𝔴𝔞𝔫𝔱 𝔱𝔬 𝔢𝔪𝔭𝔥𝔞𝔰𝔦𝔷𝔢 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔱, 𝔩𝔦𝔨𝔢 𝔥𝔦𝔪, ℑ 𝔦𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔫𝔡 𝔱𝔬 𝔠𝔬𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔢𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔶" 𝔤𝔲𝔦𝔰𝔢 " 𝔬𝔣 𝔖𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫 𝔦𝔫 𝔦𝔱𝔰𝔢𝔩𝔣, 𝔞𝔰 𝔰𝔲𝔠𝔥, 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔲𝔱 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔦𝔫𝔣𝔩𝔲𝔢𝔫𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔩𝔞𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔦𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔭𝔯𝔢𝔱𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔰. 𝔅𝔲𝔱 𝔦𝔣 𝔪𝔦𝔩𝔢𝔰 𝔱𝔞𝔨𝔢𝔰 𝔞 𝔩𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔞𝔯𝔶 𝔞𝔭𝔭𝔯𝔬𝔞𝔠𝔥, 𝔰𝔱𝔲𝔡𝔶𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔦𝔪𝔞𝔤𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔊𝔬𝔡 𝔭𝔯𝔢𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔡 𝔦𝔫 𝔢𝔞𝔠𝔥 𝔟𝔬𝔬𝔨 𝔬𝔣 𝔱𝔥𝔢 ℌ𝔢𝔟𝔯𝔢𝔴 𝔅𝔦𝔟𝔩𝔢 𝔦𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔯 𝔱𝔯𝔞𝔡𝔦𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔞𝔩 𝔬𝔯𝔡𝔢𝔯, 𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔫 ℑ'𝔪 𝔞𝔦𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔞 𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔢 𝔠𝔥𝔯𝔬𝔫𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔥𝔦𝔰𝔱𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩 𝔞𝔭𝔭𝔯𝔬𝔞𝔠𝔥 (𝔞𝔩𝔟𝔢𝔦𝔱 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔞 𝔩𝔢𝔰𝔰 𝔟𝔯𝔬𝔞𝔡 𝔰𝔠𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔣𝔦𝔠 𝔞𝔭𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔲𝔰). ℑ 𝔴𝔦𝔩𝔩 𝔠𝔬𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔭𝔬𝔰𝔰𝔦𝔟𝔩𝔢 𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔤𝔦𝔫 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔪𝔬𝔡𝔦𝔣𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫 𝔬𝔣 𝔢𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔶 ⻪

𝕴 𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖑 𝖈𝖔𝖓𝖘𝖎𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖔𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖓 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖒𝖔𝖉𝖎𝖋𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖔𝖋 𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖞 𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖔𝖋 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖎𝖙𝖘 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘. 𝕴 𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖑 𝖈𝖆𝖗𝖊𝖋𝖚𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝖊𝖝𝖆𝖒𝖎𝖓𝖊 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖔𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖚𝖒𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖚𝖒𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝖊𝖆𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝖆𝖚𝖙𝖍𝖔𝖗. 𝕴 𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖑 𝖓𝖔𝖙 𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖒𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊𝖑𝖞 𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖙𝖊 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖔𝖕𝖎𝖓𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝖆𝖚𝖙𝖍𝖔𝖗𝖘. 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝖙𝖗𝖔𝖚𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖍 𝖆𝖑𝖑 𝖍𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝖜𝖔𝖗𝖐𝖘 𝖎𝖘 𝖙𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖗 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖘 𝖙𝖊𝖓𝖉 𝖙𝖔 𝖛𝖎𝖊𝖜 𝖕𝖆𝖘𝖙 𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖘 𝖙𝖍𝖗𝖔𝖚𝖌𝖍 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖒 𝖔𝖋 𝖈𝖔𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖘 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖙 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖕𝖆𝖘𝖙 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙 𝖔𝖋 𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝖐𝖓𝖔𝖜𝖑𝖊𝖉𝖌𝖊. 𝕾𝖔𝖒𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖊𝖘 𝖘𝖚𝖈𝖍 𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖒𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝖔𝖗 𝖆𝖓𝖆𝖈𝖍𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖈 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖟𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖎𝖘 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑, 𝖘𝖔𝖒𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖊𝖘 𝖓𝖔𝖙. 𝕴𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖆𝖘𝖊, 𝖜𝖊 𝖆𝖈𝖈𝖊𝖕𝖙 𝖘𝖔𝖒𝖊𝖔𝖓𝖊'𝖘 𝖒𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖆𝖘 𝖋𝖆𝖈𝖙 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖇𝖚𝖎𝖑𝖉 𝖔𝖚𝖗 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖘 𝖇𝖆𝖘𝖊𝖉 𝖔𝖓 𝖎𝖙

𝕴 𝖜𝖔𝖚𝖑𝖉 𝖑𝖎𝖐𝖊 𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖊 𝖎𝖙 𝖈𝖑𝖊𝖆𝖗, 𝖙𝖔 𝖈𝖑𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖋𝖞 𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖈𝖎𝖋𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝖜𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝖎𝖘 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖆𝖇𝖔𝖚𝖙 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖜𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝖎𝖙 𝖉𝖔𝖊𝖘 𝖓𝖔𝖙 𝖘𝖆𝖞. 𝖂𝖍𝖊𝖓 𝕴 𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑 𝖒𝖞 𝖇𝖔𝖔𝖐 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓: 𝖆 𝕭𝖎𝖔𝖌𝖗𝖆𝖕𝖍𝖞, 𝕴 𝖕𝖔𝖎𝖓𝖙 𝖉𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖈𝖙𝖑𝖞 𝖙𝖔 𝕵𝖆𝖈𝖐 𝖒𝖎𝖑𝖊𝖘'𝖘 𝕲𝖔𝖉: 𝖆 𝕭𝖎𝖔𝖌𝖗𝖆𝖕𝖍𝖞. 𝕴𝖓 𝖉𝖔𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖘𝖔, 𝕴 𝖜𝖆𝖓𝖙 𝖙𝖔 𝖊𝖒𝖕𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖎𝖟𝖊 𝖙𝖍𝖆𝖙, 𝖑𝖎𝖐𝖊 𝖍𝖎𝖒, 𝕴 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖓𝖉 𝖙𝖔 𝖈𝖔𝖓𝖘𝖎𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖞" 𝖌𝖚𝖎𝖘𝖊 " 𝖔𝖋 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖊𝖑𝖋, 𝖆𝖘 𝖘𝖚𝖈𝖍, 𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖍𝖔𝖚𝖙 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖎𝖓𝖋𝖑𝖚𝖊𝖓𝖈𝖊 𝖔𝖋 𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝖎𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘. 𝕭𝖚𝖙 𝖎𝖋 𝖒𝖎𝖑𝖊𝖘 𝖙𝖆𝖐𝖊𝖘 𝖆 𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖗𝖔𝖆𝖈𝖍, 𝖘𝖙𝖚𝖉𝖞𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖎𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖊 𝖔𝖋 𝕲𝖔𝖉 𝖕𝖗𝖊𝖘𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖊𝖉 𝖎𝖓 𝖊𝖆𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖔𝖔𝖐 𝖔𝖋 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝕳𝖊𝖇𝖗𝖊𝖜 𝕭𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖗 𝖙𝖗𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑 𝖔𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗, 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖓 𝕴'𝖒 𝖆𝖎𝖒𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖋𝖔𝖗 𝖆 𝖒𝖔𝖗𝖊 𝖈𝖍𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖔𝖌𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖍𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖗𝖔𝖆𝖈𝖍 (𝖆𝖑𝖇𝖊𝖎𝖙 𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖍 𝖆 𝖑𝖊𝖘𝖘 𝖇𝖗𝖔𝖆𝖉 𝖘𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖋𝖎𝖈 𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖘)