acting Career

Finally, I very calmly refer to the "diagnosis for photography, " Bo think that they may well be put. True, there are some nuances, yeah. First, it is desirable not only to look but to see. Only it does not mean - look for hidden meaning and draw it on your own understanding of the man. On the contrary, you must send in FIG all their ideas and try to be here this very person in the photo. Feel yourself in his shoes, to perceive his posture, facial expression. And it will all become the key to what you actually see. (And by the way, there's just say - nonsense, we are all different. All of us more or less the same, and our gestures, expression of emotions - it's so instinctive, so ancient, but because so universal that if properly seized on facial expression and posture, receive more than half of the information that I felt at that moment the other person). But the rest of the clear can only be based on specific external evidence and there is a second. So secondly - you need to know where, when and under what circumstances the photo was taken. As accurately as possible. Then do not make a mistake in step 1 and the diagnosis made by you, will be more or less accurate. Not absolutely, clearly, but with quite a high chance.

"Indiana Jones Trilogy, " "Good Will Hunting"

Bible; «Fountainhead» Ayn Rand

practice